Skip to content

Joe Atzberger

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 2,646 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    117 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joe Atzberger commented  · 

    Refer to RFC 5233 section 4: "Subaddress comparisons".

    The HIBP implementation for this would be plain. Instead of the search index being the literal address value, it should be the normalized *deliverable* address. E.G., instead of "person+foobar@example.com", the index would contain "person@example.com".

    Search input should be normalized the same way and therefore find all subaddress variations.

    There is some variation in delimiter between providers, but pragmatically, there are only a few major predominant styles. At a minimum, the UI could prompt "X+Y@z.co" looks like a subaddress, do you want to include "X@z.co" in your search?

    Joe Atzberger supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base